Leadership Styles and Agile Decision-Making in County Governments in Kenya: A Case Study of Nairobi City County, Kenya

Authors

  • Bramwel Ole Lekeroi Scholar, Management University of Africa, Kenya
  • Isabella Sile Senior Lecturer, Management University of Africa, Kenya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61108/ijsshr.v3i2.200

Keywords:

Leadership Styles, Transformational Leadership, Transactional Leadership, Servant Leadership, Democratic Leadership, Agile Decision-Making

Abstract

In an era marked by dynamic policy changes, citizen expectations, and technological disruption, agile decision-making has become an indispensable capability for public sector institutions, particularly within devolved governance structures like Nairobi City County. Despite significant efforts to reform governance at the county level, sluggish decision-making, lack of innovation, and top-down leadership styles continue to undermine service delivery and institutional responsiveness. This study examined the effect of leadership styles on agile decision-making in Nairobi City County, Kenya. The specific objectives were to determine the effect of transformational, transactional, servant, and democratic leadership on agile decision-making. This study adopts Dynamic Capabilities Theory as the anchor theory to explain the dependent variable, agile decision-making. In addition, Transformational Leadership Theory, Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) Theory, Servant Leadership Theory, and Participative Decision-Making Theory are applied to support the independent variables of transformational, transactional, servant, and democratic leadership respectively. A descriptive research design was adopted, targeting a population of county departments within Nairobi City County Government. A sample of 10 departments was purposively selected, from which 171 respondents comprising departmental heads, senior managers, and technical officers were drawn using stratified and simple random sampling. Data were collected through structured questionnaires and analyzed using SPSS Version 28, employing correlation and multiple regression analysis to test the hypotheses. The correlation results revealed that all four leadership styles were positively and significantly related to agile decision-making, with transformational leadership (r = 0.681, p < 0.01) showing the strongest relationship, followed by democratic (r = 0.674, p < 0.01), servant (r = 0.662, p < 0.01), and transactional leadership (r = 0.646, p < 0.01). Regression analysis further confirmed that transformational leadership (β = 0.340, p < 0.05), transactional leadership (β = 0.278, p < 0.05), servant leadership (β = 0.299, p < 0.05), and democratic leadership (β = 0.320, p < 0.05) each had a statistically significant positive effect on agile decision-making. The model explained 64 percent of the variance in agile decision-making (R² = 0.640, F = 74.751, p < 0.001). These findings demonstrated that leadership behaviours significantly influenced decision agility in Nairobi City County, with transformational and democratic leadership emerging as particularly influential. The study concluded that agile decision-making in devolved governance can be enhanced through leadership behaviours that emphasize vision, accountability, ethics, empowerment, consultation, and inclusivity. It recommends that Nairobi City County strengthen transformational and democratic leadership practices to enhance adaptability, responsiveness, and citizen-centered governance, while also reinforcing transactional and servant leadership dimensions that promote accountability and inclusivity. These findings provide valuable insights for county governments in Kenya and other devolved systems seeking to strengthen decision-making agility through effective leadership practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

. Adusei, C., & Kwarteng, K. (2020). Participatory budgeting and decentralization in Ghana: A case study of democratic leadership. Journal of African Public Policy, 12(2), 33–45.

. Anderson, R. (2009). Exploring servant leadership: A critical review. Leadership Review, 9(1), 5–16.

. Arshad, M., & Ameen, A. (2021). Agility in public sector institutions: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research, 11(3), 74–90.

. Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2004). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Sage Publications.

. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press.

. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.

. Chege, S. (2022). Democratic leadership and institutional performance in urban counties. African Journal of Governance, 9(1), 22–36.

. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

. Daft, R. L. (2018). The leadership experience (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.

. Deloitte. (2020). Agile government: Building public sector adaptability. Deloitte Insights.

. Denning, S. (2018). The age of agile: How smart companies are transforming the way work gets done. AMACOM.

. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121.

. Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019). Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111–132.

. Gikonyo, M. (2022). Stakeholder engagement and agile governance in Kenyan counties. Public Sector Review, 14(2), 42–57.

. Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Paulist Press.

. Howell, J. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, and charismatic leadership: A test of antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(6), 891–902.

. Karani, J., & Wambua, M. (2020). Participative leadership and organizational innovation in county governments. Kenya Journal of Leadership Studies, 5(1), 18–28.

. Kassa, B. A., & Kibret, D. (2020). Institutional agility in the African public sector. African Public Management Review, 10(2), 19–34.

. Kilonzo, M. (2023). Inclusive decision-making and governance responsiveness in Nairobi County. African Journal of Public Policy, 7(2), 15–29.

. Kim, S., & Yoon, G. (2015). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing innovation. Public Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 360–390.

. Kimathi, B. (2022). Servant leadership and service innovation in Kenyan public health institutions. Journal of Health Management, 6(1), 48–62.

. Kombo, D. K., & Tromp, D. L. A. (2006). Proposal and thesis writing: An introduction. Pauline’s Publications Africa.

. Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques (2nd ed.). New Age International.

. Laub, J. A. (1999). Assessing the servant organization: Development of the servant organizational leadership assessment (SOLA) instrument. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(2), 308A.

. Lee, K., & Shin, D. (2019). Transformational leadership in Singapore's public sector. Asian Journal of Public Administration, 41(2), 167–183.

. Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behaviour in experimentally created social climates. Journal of Social Psychology, 10(2), 271–299.

. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. (2008). Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 161–177.

. Makori, D. (2021). Servant leadership and performance in Nairobi County schools. Kenya Journal of Educational Administration, 4(3), 61–74.

. Mburu, R., & Kiprotich, S. (2021). Democratic leadership and policy innovation in devolved units. Journal of Public Policy and Leadership, 5(4), 87–101.

. McKinsey & Company. (2021). Public sector agility: A blueprint for action. McKinsey Insights.

. Mensah, K. (2021). Leadership for Vision 2050: Rwanda’s strategic approach. Journal of African Policy, 8(2), 58–73.

. Mugenda, O. M., & Mugenda, A. G. (2003). Research methods: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Acts Press.

. Musyoka, J. (2020). Transformational leadership and public sector responsiveness: A case of Nairobi County health department. Nairobi Journal of Administration and Leadership, 3(1), 33–47.

. Mwangi, J. (2021). Transactional leadership and service timeliness in Central Kenya counties. Public Service Delivery Journal, 6(2), 54–69.

. Mwangi, P., & Wekesa, S. (2022). Governance and agile leadership in Kenya. African Governance Review, 11(1), 14–26.

. Njagi, J., & Kihoro, J. (2022). Transformational leadership and public sector agility in Kenya. Journal of African Leadership and Development, 8(1), 21–36.

. Njenga, G., & Wambua, A. (2021). Servant leadership and stakeholder engagement in Kenyan counties. Kenya Journal of Public Leadership, 3(2), 23–39.

. Northouse, P. G. (2019). Leadership: Theory and practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.

. Nzioka, M. (2019). Leadership and performance monitoring in Kenya’s public sector. Public Sector Watch, 5(1), 20–37.

. OECD. (2022). Agile governance for the digital age. OECD Publishing.

. Onyango, P. (2020). Leadership styles and organizational discipline in devolved units. Journal of Local Governance, 7(1), 14–25.

. Ooko, P. (2020). Data-driven decision-making in Nairobi County governance. Kenya ICT Review, 4(3), 11–19.

. Otieno, D. (2020). Inclusive leadership and county governance in Nairobi. Governance Insights, 2(4), 49–65.

. Park, H., & Lee, J. (2020). Digital transformation and agile government in South Korea. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 13(3), 244–259.

. Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Agility and ambidexterity in public organizations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 35(2), 205–225.

. Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2018). Organizational behaviour (18th ed.). Pearson Education.

. Sagie, A., & Koslowsky, M. (2000). Participation and empowerment in organizations: Modelling, effectiveness, and applications. Sage Publications.

. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business students (5th ed.). Pearson Education.

. Spears, L. C. (1998). Insights on leadership: Service, stewardship, spirit, and servant leadership. John Wiley & Sons.

. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

. Tourish, D., & Pinnington, A. (2002). Transformational leadership, corporate cultism and the spirituality paradigm: An unholy trinity in the workplace? Human Relations, 55(2), 147–172.

. Vroom, V. H., & Yetton, P. W. (1973). Leadership and decision-making. University of Pittsburgh Press.

. Wamalwa, C., & Otieno, M. (2021). Leadership style and change management in Kenyan counties. Journal of Strategic Public Administration, 9(1), 78–92.

. Wekesa, P., & Ouma, B. (2020). Collective decision-making and service delivery in Kenya's counties. African Journal of Local Governance, 3(2), 13–27.

. World Bank. (2023). Institutional resilience through agile governance. World Bank Policy Report.

. Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson.

. Zollo, M., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science, 13(3), 339–351.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-19

How to Cite

Lekeroi, B. O., & Sile, I. (2025). Leadership Styles and Agile Decision-Making in County Governments in Kenya: A Case Study of Nairobi City County, Kenya. International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research (IJSSHR) ISSN 2959-7056 (o); 2959-7048 (p), 3(2), 190–208. https://doi.org/10.61108/ijsshr.v3i2.200

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research (IJSSHR) ISSN 2959-7056 (o); 2959-7048 (p)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research (IJSSHR) ISSN 2959-7056 (o); 2959-7048 (p)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research (IJSSHR) adopts the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license terms for all published articles. This license governs the rights and permissions associated with the use, distribution, and reproduction of the published content, ensuring a balance between authors' intellectual property rights and the wider dissemination of knowledge.

Under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license, the following terms apply:

  1. Attribution (BY): Users are required to give appropriate credit to the original authors and provide a link to the original work. Proper attribution acknowledges the intellectual contribution of the authors and allows others to trace the research back to its source.

  2. NonCommercial (NC): The license prohibits commercial use of the published material. Users may not exploit the work for commercial purposes without obtaining explicit permission from the copyright holder. Non-commercial use includes activities such as selling, licensing, or monetizing the content.

  3. Adaptation: The CC BY-NC 4.0 license allows users to remix, transform, or build upon the original work, but only for non-commercial purposes. Adaptations or derivative works based on the published material must also be shared under the same license terms, giving proper attribution to the original authors.

The CC BY-NC 4.0 license ensures that the published research in the International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research remains accessible to a wide audience while respecting the intellectual property rights of the authors. It encourages the sharing, dissemination, and collaborative use of knowledge within the academic community, fostering innovation and furthering the advancement of social sciences and humanities research.

Authors publishing their work in IJSSHR grant the journal the right to publish and distribute their articles under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license. This license facilitates the unrestricted availability of the research, allowing readers, educators, and researchers to access, cite, and build upon the published content, as long as they comply with the license terms.

By adopting the CC BY-NC 4.0 license, IJSSHR promotes open access principles and encourages the responsible use of scholarly work. It empowers researchers to disseminate their findings widely and fosters collaboration, ensuring that knowledge generated in the field of social sciences and humanities can have a broader societal impact.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC